[quote name='Annie' date='Sep 11 2005, 03:09 PM']Well, just my opinion, but from that explanation above, shouldn't the past be approvable and the future unapprovable? Because you're saying that the past is whats already happened, so we know what it's like and may be a fan of it, but if it's in the future and we have no idea what it's like... you get what I'm saying? hehe, Well anyway, like Loki said, that would rule out a few fanlistings I would have wanted to see and join. Guess I'll wait for the final word :bounce:
[post=\"99089\"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
[/quote]
I believe Lexa meant that the past would be usually based on a real place (or time period) because it happened already and is then based on that, but normally future locations in series are not based on a pre-existing place because they're happening in a new and unknown time. Obviously, if a future place in a series is approved you can be a fan of it because it exists in the series and thus you know it - it just isn't know in a realistic 'can overlap with already existing real world places' way.
(Lexa, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's what you were getting at?
)